On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:58:35 GMT, Shiina <Shiina@jp.net> wrote:
>In reply to "Nite Rider" who wrote the following:
>
>> Nice.
>> Interesting.
>> I prefer photos, not blurry videos.
>>
>> But Still, Thanks OP-Shiina
>>
>> Nite
>
>then you are doin something wrong, cuzz vid is not blurry at all
I think, the camera operator did something wrong.
First, he/she never heard of tripods, let alone he/she uses one.
No, fiddling constantly with the zoom button is more interesting.
A problem btw with the vast majority of would-be camera-operators.
Next the camera-operator seems to be forgetting WHAT he's trying to
capture.
Look at 03:50; it must be the wall he wants to show. BTW, during the
whole movie the wall appears sharper than the girl.
Focussing is something you learn or never learn. And yes, the wall did
NOT move!
"No sir, I've got an autofocus camera, so I don't have to worry about
that!"
Yes, we can see that for 11 minutes: another blurry vid and the only
interesting thing is that the girl is taking her clothes off.
Hurray,let's put it on the net!
Let's figure it out: 11 minutes at 30 fps or so, that is some 20,000
frames in total. How many could you label as "sharp"??? (apart from
the first ones which only make up the title). Well, I've seen a few
around 03:50 too.
I'm not gonna say "Thank you very much for that, Shiina" but I guess
you'll keep calling me a troll :-)
And finally, of course it's possible that I got the whole thing wrong:
Anny is not the girl's, but the camera's name!
Louis
|
|