In article <XnsA409C12D787E3zupnowhere@74.209.131.13>, zup
<zup@nowhere> wrote:
> yamas <yamas@bloodyhell.no.way> wrote in news:
> > or, it could be that contrary to you morons he knows that jpeg is a
> > lossy compression format and wants to get the most out of his photos
> > and that his camera might not have a raw setting, or he hasn't
> > discovered it yet
>
>
> They're not my photos, I found them somewhere. Also you're correct that I
> am concerned about losing image quality if I compressed them.
>
I'm with you and the other guy who shares your view. As a pro
photographer, I would never post small, shitty jpgs which deprive
aficionados of the ability to appreciate large, data-rich versions.
Lovers of small pics can delete all the data they want; lovers of big
pics can't go the other way.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.purebeauty/1063', 'Re: Zup, why don't you compress them a little, like this? - "38427293eCt.jpg" 784.6 kBytes yEnc')){kind=link}