Many thanks - extras and fills always welcome :-)
I am also missing everything above 239 - so if anyone fancies filling
the gaps - most welcome
bd
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:49:17 +0000, Meleager <Meleager@beauty.radar>
wrote:
>That's really helpful BD.
>
>Many, many thanks.
>
>Along the way I discovered one which was not in the relevant set
>(36-066). It might just have got missed off, but it is attached
>here (your usual pw) in case you want it.
>
>Thanks again for taking the trouble with these. I assume your
>preview shows all the sets you have? I'd like to find 239-249, a
>complete 253 and any higher if anyone has them.
>
>Cheers,
>M
>
|
|