>If your source happens to have the more recent sets of J, I'm sure I'm
>not the only one that would appreciate them as well. And if not,
>that's fine too.
Yes, and yes! The inclusions this time were excellent.
I also live in hope that R***y 86+ (esp 89) will show up
sometime, but I fear I'm in a minority of admirers there!.
But, we're very grateful, whatever is possible.
Thanks again.
M
|
|