On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:46:25 -0600, HMS Victor Victorian
<victorvictorian@hushunomail.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 23:16:55 -0500, TE <theeagle1957@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 13:26:38 -0700, Joe Btfsplk
>><joe_btfsplk@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:05:33 -0500, TE <theeagle1957@hotmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:35:07 +0100, bendog2000 NP-d09 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi
>>>>>Thanks for all comments and thoughts - I have passed them on.
>>>>>I am not entirely sure how the sites know individual poster names when
>>>>>it is public, but it seems they do - and while I agree they also would
>>>>>have access here, for whatever reason that has been okay up to now -
>>>>>however, on a forum obviously not...sad and unfortunate.
>>>>>
>>>>>Let's hope I can post more in the future - I am happy to contribute
>>>>>what I can
>>>>>
>>>>>bd
>>>>
>>>>thanks for all your contrib.
>>>>Is it possible for the downloader info to be contained in the
>>>>watermark?
>>>(bottom posted)
>>> Do some searches on "Source Tracking" in reference to Watermarking.
>>>
>>> I'm thinking that this type of watermarking can be applied at point
>>>of origin with seperate identity for each person receiving the
>>>material.
>>> Not sure if any of those that rec'd it can identify the data in the
>>>watermark anyway, except those applying the watermark, let alone
>>>trying to find the watermark.... or the "real" watermark..
>>> Research it since I may be wrong.
>>>Hope that helps.
>>
>>The reason I asked this is that I downloaded a bunch of new star stuff
>>and didn't post them but gave then to someone else to post and i got
>>Balcklisted; not the guy that posted them. Kinda' spooky.
>
>Dear Sir,
>
>Sites do watermark images, and I have known some which lay in a
>watermark when an image is downloaded by a particular client. If I am
>not mistaken, Vogelfuetter did this with earlier versions of his
>Paradise sites, so it may be very well that they identified the
>watermark as being associated with you.
>
>Just my intuition, right or wrong!
>
>Sincerely,
>
>HMS Victor Victorian, NP-g18
>
>God Save the Queen.
>God Bless the Prince of Wales.
>God Preserve the Windsors.
>Rule Britannia!
Maybe we could do watermarking like the old days.
A bunch of stains on the images that appear like they got wet somehow,
although it was not water.
A lot of "watermarks" meant that they were really good pics.......
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|