On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 13:26:38 -0700, Joe Btfsplk
<joe_btfsplk@nowhere.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:05:33 -0500, TE <theeagle1957@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:35:07 +0100, bendog2000 NP-d09 wrote:
>>
>>>Hi
>>>Thanks for all comments and thoughts - I have passed them on.
>>>I am not entirely sure how the sites know individual poster names when
>>>it is public, but it seems they do - and while I agree they also would
>>>have access here, for whatever reason that has been okay up to now -
>>>however, on a forum obviously not...sad and unfortunate.
>>>
>>>Let's hope I can post more in the future - I am happy to contribute
>>>what I can
>>>
>>>bd
>>
>>thanks for all your contrib.
>>Is it possible for the downloader info to be contained in the
>>watermark?
>(bottom posted)
> Do some searches on "Source Tracking" in reference to Watermarking.
>
> I'm thinking that this type of watermarking can be applied at point
>of origin with seperate identity for each person receiving the
>material.
> Not sure if any of those that rec'd it can identify the data in the
>watermark anyway, except those applying the watermark, let alone
>trying to find the watermark.... or the "real" watermark..
> Research it since I may be wrong.
>Hope that helps.
The reason I asked this is that I downloaded a bunch of new star stuff
and didn't post them but gave then to someone else to post and i got
Balcklisted; not the guy that posted them. Kinda' spooky.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|