On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:54:02 +0000, Thinking Man <thewholetruth@USA> wrote:
>On 14/12/2014 15:14, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>>
>>> Also, you must by now understand that "Charles Lindbergh" is clearly
>>> anti-German.
>>
>> Just opposed to revisionist history or the white-washing of Nazi aggression and
>> the culpability of the German populace.
>>
>
>A very noble sentiment, dear fellow, sufficient to rouse me from lurking
>status. You'll end up as smug as the Brits very soon.
>
>Is there not a saying about sin and stones, or does your "patriotism"
>blind you utterly?
>
>http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/franciscofirstvietnam.html
>
>http://philippineamericanwar.webs.com/balangigamassacre1901.htm
>
Ad-hominem attacks have no place in a civil debate.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|
')){kind=link}