alt.binaries.pictures.militaryPrev. Next
Re: Video - USS Laffey - Kamikaze Attack - 1945 Easynews - www.easynews. ..
Charles Lindbergh (spirit@stlouis.invalid) 2014/11/22 10:32

Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!newspeer1.nac.net!goblin2!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!enother.net!enother.net!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx31.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Charles Lindbergh <spirit@stlouis.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.military
Subject: Re: Video - USS Laffey - Kamikaze Attack - 1945
Message-ID: <mvh17apr7972trojm4akec32t2h1dph2ae@4ax.com>
References: <2vmr6ap33iakl65r99fqu0nss90dj76d7v@4ax.com> <2014112208312237964-none.of@the.above.net>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:32:34 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2049
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3518919427
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.military:567

On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:31:22 -0500, A Non E Mouse <none.of@the.above.net> wrote:

>On 2014-11-20 12:20:16 +0000, Charles Lindbergh said:
>
>> This is a very poignant 4.5 minute video about the Kamikaze attack on the USS
>> Laffey in 1945.
>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4zkp7hvrgbcd7gd/D-qPNsG9ym#lh:null-Laffey%20Enhanced%20vo%203.wmv
>>
>
>Errm...
>
>Quite a lot of that video wasn't from LAFFEY. There were sections
>showing the shell and the propellant being loaded separately. 5" 38s
>used cased rounds, with the shell and the propellant in one unit. There
>was a section showing what I'm pretty sure was a kamikaze strike on
>BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, and another showing a torpedo attack on (I think,
>I'm not sure) HORNET. There were also brief sections showing triple
>turrets; that'd be from dreadnoughts or cruisers, not a destroyer. And
>at least one of the sections showing 40-mm quad positions _had_ to have
>been filmed on a dreadnought, possibly WASHINGTON, I can't tell for
>sure, not enough of the ship is in view.

Yes, and there was also a smattering of CGI.  The point of the video was to
artistically illustrate the experience, which I felt was presented in a very
effective manner.

Follow-ups:1234
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite