Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Jeremy Jeremyson <picoparsec@magma.ca>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.military
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
Subject: Re: 1944-05-08 CV US USS Ticonderoga1944-04CV-14.jpg
Organization: Discombobulation
References: <ce8usat6i6n1ld6cek3ec5ok5puoanu4eb@4ax.com> <CZ-dnfmXIYoY2E3InZ2dnUU78TGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <picoparsec-C09CBC.14383816082015@unknown.hwng.net> <danielgregoire-18428C.19062117082015@news-europe.giganews.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.1 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:41:23 -0400
Message-ID: <picoparsec-D1B429.21412317082015@unknown.hwng.net>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
Lines: 25
X-Trace: 8ec1c55d28d58c99a6f8a20704
X-Received-Body-CRC: 969754014
X-Received-Bytes: 1622
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.military:1446
In article
<danielgregoire-18428C.19062117082015@news-europe.giganews.com>,
Daniel GREGOIRE <danielgregoire@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
=>
=> I think that the CV41/42/43 are not Essex but Midway class (45000t
=> against 27000t)
You are perfectly correct, and mea culpa for not counting the
lists of numbers I posted and so discovering that there were
three too many.
The CV-41, the CV-42, and the CV-43 were all most definitely
NOT Essex class carriers. Well spotted.
=> But thanks for a clear explanation
It was a fun item of research when I discovered that I had no
real clue of the differences either.
Cheers,
JeremyJ
--
Jeremy Jeremyson -- picoparsec at magma dot ca
Discombobulated in Disturbia
|
|
){kind=link}