Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: RFF <rff@caltech.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.joanne-guest
Subject: Re: <*New*> Mike Prior photoshoot 1998? (unclassified) ((13 of 20) Joanne Guest Toplessness Mike Prior 1998 PS (8).jpg (01/22) (4792K) <-- Another question, PRI
Message-ID: <uch6la5jgtcdvkkihntv36j2bdie6bo1on@4ax.com>
References: <Cwq_w.340096$Fh7.24879@fx20.iad> <XnsA492DDDD2D4D4dogfartzcom@81.171.92.234>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 08:38:40 -0400
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1583512402
X-Received-Bytes: 1764
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.joanne-guest:278
I don't hink a differnt version exists, but I'll run a similary
checker to see fi there's something.
On Wed, 06 May 2015 20:48:36 GMT, Dogfartz <dog@fartz.com> wrote:
>RFF@caltech.com (RFF) wrote news:Cwq_w.340096$Fh7.24879@fx20.iad:
>
>>
>> begin 644 Joanne Guest Toplessness Mike Prior 1998 PS (8).jpg
>
>
>I absolutely adore this picture as its frequesnt appearance as my desktop
>wallpaper proves.
>
>I am curious as to whether you know whether a fuller version of the picture
>exists? It just looks odd with one of Jo's feet cut off. I don't have a
>foot fetish, just, for want of a better term, a pedantic notion that the
>picture was intended as a full nude portrait and is thus incomplete.
>
>DF
|
|
 ((13 of 20) Joanne Guest Toplessness Mike Prior 1998 PS (8).jpg (01/22) (4792K) <-- Another question, PRI')){kind=link}