>>Ah, ha. After seeing your two additional pics, I believe the GA-116
>>was actually KA-176. Look right to you?
>>
>
>That ID isn't just hard to read, it's hard to even see.
>Well spotted. Knowing what to expect, it does look like
>KA-176. Thanks rwl, I didn't have that image!
Thanks, RR. And you're so right about how much easier it is when you
have a clue ahead of time.
--rwl
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage/5864', 'Re: Nostalgia - "GirlieMagazine -lrvo45Imcr1qzv6hko1_1280.jpg" {03/50}yEnc (1/1)')){kind=link}