On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 01:31:16 -0600, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Ah, ha. After seeing your two additional pics, I believe the GA-116 was
>actually KA-176. Look right to you?
That ID isn't just hard to read, it's hard to even see.
Well spotted. Knowing what to expect, it does look like
KA-176. Thanks rwl, I didn't have that image!
RR
|
|