On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 01:31:16 -0600, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Ah, ha. After seeing your two additional pics, I believe the GA-116 was
>actually KA-176. Look right to you?
That ID isn't just hard to read, it's hard to even see.
Well spotted. Knowing what to expect, it does look like
KA-176. Thanks rwl, I didn't have that image!
RR
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage/5848', 'Re: Nostalgia - "GirlieMagazine -lrvo45Imcr1qzv6hko1_1280.jpg" {03/50}yEnc (1/1)')){kind=link}