Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:54:07 -0500
Message-ID: <538EB4A3.1040803@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 23:54:43 -0600
From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: Camera Art1 w. Jackie Miller - File 05 of 11 - camera art 1e.JPG (1/1)
References: <wdmdnXDiVpz7qhHOnZ2dnUVZ_gkAAAAA@giganews.com> <538D74A3.6000803@yahoo.com> <XnsA341A6D73666Croakerblackcompany@216.196.97.131>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 22
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-1RGhkjpIL/z5FL9pw13RQ1+JxidEmD5vk21udnD8WxIONmJj2BC8ViEN5J/rFwhzkQWI1/rIwB7qEx2!DfwdWX/4yiS+BAmBTGsdfZywy4SbKTvrEJOgrzWcJBuCq2ZgfA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2251
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2817828103
X-Received-Bytes: 2615
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:515
>I think it has to do with the claimed intent of the mag; that is,
>"Figure Studies for Artists". You were studying the pics as an artist,
>not to ogle the model. Who the model was was irrelevant.
If just studying the pics from an artistic POV, then even the
cameraman's name would be unnecessary but it gets prominent show. So, it
appears there's a bit more than just composition being given the reader.
I think the reader, assuming he/she really was a developing photographer
(pun intended!), would have been better served given the model names.
Their names would be relavant to their engaging the same models for
their own shoots. Perhaps the models didn't pay to get their names
mentioned (no free advertising)?
>No smut here - just educational material - no need to bring in the law.
>Ri-i-i-i-ght!
Heheheh! Yeah! I'm looking too hard at the surface layer of the reality.
--rwl
|
|
')){kind=link}