retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in news:538D74A3.6000803
@yahoo.com:
> "this model"
>
> Lazy editor! Give us the ladies' names! :-)
>
> Does it seem sometimes that mags such as this treat models as though
> they are inferior to the photographer and the composition in the
> creation of the final product. Otherwise, why not give the model's name
> a mention?
>
> --rwl
>
>
I think it has to do with the claimed intent of the mag; that is, "Figure
Studies for Artists". You were studying the pics as an artist, not to ogle
the model. Who the model was was irrelevant.
No smut here - just educational material - no need to bring in the law.
Ri-i-i-i-ght!
|
|
')){kind=link}