On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 00:39:57 -0700, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
>Thanks for a new 2052! Personally, I've kept her as 'Judy G'.
>Maybe someday we'll run across documentation.
> >
>
>Hi, RR. Will keep looking for the Judy documentation but here's what I
>found for Sharon.
Thanks. I wasn't questioning the Sharon Cordell ID, just
commenting on the Geeson Gleason uncertainty.
Very nice set of Laurene by the way. Must have been Casual
Friday.
RR
|
|