Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: Nostalgia - "Burlesque as you like it! -n4fbguAc6t1qzmvp7o1_1280.jpg" {28/50}yEnc (1/1)
From: BillyBob <Billsfakemail@here.com>
References: <536ca589$0$7099$c3e8da3$40d4fd75@news.astraweb.com> <XnsA3285BB72ECEBroakerblackcompany@216.196.97.131> <XnsA3286F9A09DFCbillswertjknm@69.16.179.26> <536DB90D.5030402@yahoo.com>
Organization: Your Company
Message-ID: <XnsA32957C2269B5billswertjknm@69.16.179.27>
User-Agent: Xnews/06.08.25
Lines: 18
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 12:37:16 UTC
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 12:37:16 GMT
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3482503032
X-Received-Bytes: 1450
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:267
retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in news:536DB90D.5030402
@yahoo.com:
> >photo editors with their grease pencils
>
> I was once told that stage makeup was outrageous
> looking up close because when viewed from an audience well back from the
> stage it looked more natural than the real thing. Perhaps that was their
> on-stage look and the photographer wanted it that way?
>
> --rwl
That's true as well. Stage makeup was heavy and in this case "outrageous".
Looks a lot like Groucho. Well maybe not, especially below the eyes. :)
BB
|
|