Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Rodney Reason <ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: Vintage Pix - File 098 of 149 - pepper 58b.JPG (1/1)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:04:38 +0000
Message-ID: <idk97adps455kdui084opc4kuuoc5oglhq@4ax.com>
References: <_-qdnQu8CJH-AO3JnZ2dnUU7-eudnZ2d@giganews.com> <5471A860.80301@yahoo.com> <gn847allohj4edaigm71c512sv8a2nr9t4@4ax.com> <5472FB83.7010709@yahoo.com> <9qq67apr7vi1vkns5croekgc44af47tljv@4ax.com> <54743025.3030404@yahoo.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 46c8a545.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=[JFL=\Na[bbJ?XMfTm0i_cL?0kYOcDh@jhh\<9jQS2onH9C8[<\P7ad]O?=U@WfQNkjYi8kH;cObc<bVm^U@n[el>INZnWDHH4d
X-Received-Bytes: 2066
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2199483761
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:2628
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:30:45 -0700, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >I suppose it makes as much sense as the ones with different
> >IDs for what look like the SAME set.
>
>I thought that in most of those cases the different ID may have been to
>divide pics from a single shoot into picture packs that were sold
>separately (like the 12-pack novelty sets) but I'm not as sure now.
>Another interpretation could be the different IDs were due to more than
>one photographer at the shoot. Or the ownership of the negatives passed
>from one publisher to another and the IDs were changed to suit the new
>owner's catalog method (sometimes it's obvious the numbers were tampered
>with).
>
>Someone once said that those guys back then would be SO amazed that
>60-70 years later grownups were spending time trying to make sense of
>the little numbers they scribbled on the negatives.
Wasn't that Miss Didi? Probably right.
Obsessed? Me? <twitch>
RR <twitch>
|
|
')){kind=link}