On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 02:33:55 -0700, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Yes, your guess from that partial ID was right. Here's a better look at
>that ID.
>
>I've seen, once or twice, the same number used for what appear to be
>separate Bettie sets, but it may be that the ID applied to a shooting
>session in which there were major costume or set changes. Don't know how
>we can tell one way or the other, though. But here also is another
>Bettie XX-63 with yet another costume and set.
I suppose it makes as much sense as the ones with different
IDs for what look like the SAME set.
Thanks rwl, for the confirmation and the new images.
RR
|
|
')){kind=link}