>>Finally, two of a gal for whom I think we ought to have a name but
>>if we >do I don't have it where I can find it (not all that unusual,
>>I must admit).
>
>--rwl
>
>Isn't that Margie Harrison?
Thanks, Mike! That's the name! I have so many doggone names & faces &
folders now that it's a wonder I can remember any of them.
--rwl
|
|