| 
 | Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:17479 Path: news.nzbot.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
 NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 23:41:19 -0500
 From: JJ <jj@aol.com>
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
 Subject: Re: Cilla Black - 60s Brit pop star-   -----------------     - --  [01/82] - "0.jpg" yEnc (1/1)
 Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 00:41:30 -0400
 Message-ID: <jl8lbe181llblsq4vi976cn2hca2ai0hho@4ax.com>
 References: <SNCdnSF86L1rcSjBnZ2dnUU7-THNnZ2d@earthlink.com> <0dednSplhdmO_yrBnZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <dqpfbehsqd7sm7ps3dvm77mbjr87lt40no@4ax.com> <wpydnTaB4sikwifBnZ2dnUU7-SfNnZ2d@giganews.com>
 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 190419-4, 04/19/2019), Outbound message
 X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
 Lines: 57
 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
 NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.238.34.177
 X-Trace: sv3-tej/kpYcNxT2zFN+QcMuqOcpKRIZY60QEJ+nfjjFAar5Ld0eNzJ1cOshdz+wpuhaPsMiOQTH+CdYEq3!rm8M1BSnn1xOAUL8ozypaD0m6DUX9djj4AB9lXUOPamS35jqFrcIAT3wf01WUYtToYFx/cuR7ZN1!aeVpR/9z+1mRKuPuu4lmWo73
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
 X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 X-Original-Bytes: 3400
 
 On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:52:25 -0500, retrowavelength
 <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
 >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:27:47 -0500, retrowavelength
 >> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
 >>
 >>>>
 >>>> =ybegin part=1 line=128 size=15997 name=0.jpg
 >>>> =ypart begin=1 end=15997
 >>>>
 >>>> Attachment decoded: 0.jpg
 >>>> =yend size=15997 part=1 pcrc32=81b8b482
 >>>
 >>>While vintage, I kinda think this isn't in keeping with a "vintage
 >>>erotica" theme. YMMV
 >>>
 >>>--rwl
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> I can assure you there is no intent here to foul up the group by
 >> posting material outside the group focus.
 >>
 >> Guess there are several things going on here..............
 >>
 >> 1) The history of this group, and we're going back here about twenty
 >> five years, has been to post some ladies who are not thought of as
 >> erotic perhaps. to some, but are in fact erotic to others.  Cilla
 >> Black does not stirke me as erotic.  I'm not even a fan. But she
 >> was a pinup star for some.
 >>
 >> Ditto Shelley Fabares, Lesley Gore, Petula Clark, Dionne Warwick to
 >> name a few pop music stars who have traditionally posted here.
 >>
 >> 2) Over the years, this group, while using the word "erotica", has not
 >> been home to hard core porn but rather a softer look.  Perhaps that is
 >> changing with the years and new posters such as you coming in?
 >>
 >> 3) And then, there's always the option in Usenet of just ignoring a
 >> post you don't like and moving on to what you do like.
 >>
 >
 >You make good points, and I defer to whatever the others in the group
 >think. I'm merely a bit concerned that we become a movie star site when
 >there are already other groups that do a better job of that.
 >
 >By the way, concerning "new posters such as you coming in" -- I've been
 >part of this group for well over a decade. :-)  I may look new because I've
 >been posting more in the last couple years than I did before.
 >
 >--rwl
 
 
 Sorry about that oversight re: new posters.
 I don't keep close track of who's who.
 JJ-
 
 
 | 
 
 |