On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 09:48:14 -0500, Helpmate <help@mate.com> wrote:
>Rodney Reason <ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com> wrote in
>news:qvm2od9d45o4fa2r7vdm4pis5u14o10jv5@4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 15:19:59 -0500, retrowavelength
>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:08:57 -0500, retrowavelength
>>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Was it your opinion, rwl, that Jackie Park and Jackie Parks
>>>>>> are the same model? They look the same to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry about a new thread, but I find it difficult to track
>>>>>> or reply to your 'names' posts.
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi! Well, I didn't mean to suggest they were the same in that post,
>>>>>they just appeared next to each other in the files listing. But now
>>>>>that you mention it, I agree that they do appear to be the same
>>>>>model. The images look a lot alike. I think I will tag those as AKA
>>>>>names.
>>>>
>>>> Yep, me too. I had that parks_sparks file tagged Park before
>>>> because I assumed the s was just rhyming nonsense, but I think
>>>> it's backed up by your frolic file.
>>>>
>>>>>Is there something in particular that makes the names-posts hard to
>>>>>follow? Something I should consider doing differently?
>>>>
>>>> The way I download doesn't mesh well with a long list of posts
>>>> that all have exactly the same subject line. I can't find any
>>>> particular message, later. But that's just me.
>>>
>>>Hi, RR. Y'know, I have also had a similar difficulty matching the
>>>right message with later comments on it. I should see if there's a
>>>simple way to discriminate them without slowing the posting process a
>>>lot (I don't use a posting application).
>>
>> Hi, rwl. I've never used anything but Agent (which I have my
>> problems with) so I can't offer any suggestions, except maybe
>> ask Dukie. He seems to also use Xnews, very successfully.
>>
>> P.s. I have nothing on Dinah Roessler or Kathy Jean.
>
>I recommend XNews. I download Dukie's post to a folder and then go back
>and XNews gives the file name in the post line for follow up comments. A
>little putzy but it works for me.
>
>For what it is worth.
Thanks for the suggestion, HM. I did try Xnews long ago. Its
online nature just doesn't work for me.
RR
|
|