| 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:08:57 -0500
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
 Subject: Re: Jackie Park(s) - 3 attachments
 From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
 References: <3lkondds0rbhhu7rj4vhk8qqkh43i1abts@4ax.com>
 User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
 Message-ID: <zNCdnTqTbZkkO-DGnZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:08:57 -0500
 Lines: 20
 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
 X-Trace: sv3-09DSO084xapJDoXA2syhfVrfu2MVO5JNh2d03QqHX9Ff74SGLquCFXRZ1RaPir73glzPTCio9oXWxkS!HHEjWV6U88oiEuCtlqlrqicLBpth9wafcuhSqzWYPzhF4oh1+6YTc57TxUshveaY3bh71z2R0b0n
 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
 X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
 X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 X-Original-Bytes: 1631
 X-Received-Bytes: 1722
 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3771843484
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:15885
 
 > Was it your opinion, rwl, that Jackie Park and Jackie Parks
 > are the same model?  They look the same to me.
 >
 > Sorry about a new thread, but I find it difficult to track
 > or reply to your 'names' posts.
 >
 > RR
 >
 
 Hi!  Well, I didn't mean to suggest they were the same in that post, they
 just appeared next to each other in the files listing. But now that you
 mention it, I agree that they do appear to be the same model. The images
 look a lot alike. I think I will tag those as AKA names.
 
 Is there something in particular that makes the names-posts hard to follow?
 Something I should consider doing differently?
 
 Thanks!!!
 
 --rwl
 
 | 
 
 |