On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 14:25:18 -0500, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:52:03 -0500, retrowavelength
>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> begin 644 35.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Attachment decoded: 35.jpg
>>>> `
>>>> end
>>>
>>>I think that's 3S vs 35.
>>
>> That's how I read it too.
>>
>>> She's also in set 3Y & 45-13. The name "lois"
>>> in
>>>the attachments is (I think) almost certainly the invention of the
>>>photo customer who assembled them into his photo album. But I COULD be
>>>wrong!
>>
>> I looked and looked but can't see lois anywhere on those.
>> Were you referring to the index that says "Every bit of me
>> is bare" at the bottom?
>
>Yes, that was what I was referring to. My guess was that whoever was
>pasting up the photo album page may have just made up a name to go with the
>pictures. Though I admit there may be a chance that person got the name
>from the photographer when they bought the photos.
Another little mystery to keep us occupied :)
RR
|
|
')){kind=link}