| 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 14:47:55 -0500
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
 Subject: Re: Vintage Photos - File 068 of 114 - BK27XB7.jpg (1/1) - 2 attachments
 From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
 References: <5OGdnVz8y98dIMzGnZ2dnUU7-KHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <aZWdna0CieJO2s_GnZ2dnUU7-aHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <fob6ldtn187rfd9qb2qipj3nb6sokpumqa@4ax.com> <_fSdnWPWY5OsWsXGnZ2dnUU7-KOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v9vold57ehjnopm1mfl0duh7cptophi5a0@4ax.com>
 User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
 Message-ID: <nKydnVdXrbV2hMPGnZ2dnUU7-QHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
 Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 14:47:55 -0500
 Lines: 35
 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
 X-Trace: sv3-x13ZMlR2E3duyg5QaFyGGpmFSfnTpqWIvHki3fpqmbCqjEyYmVujjW3/dO+29sTvDttBx6ySnFGbC/g!48SI29K7RLQ9r2lzPiRvvUhpB/8qSLrGD87LHOV2pfidQgId7w8Zdj5evJoLRoW/9PcAtrVF/SI=
 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
 X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
 X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 X-Original-Bytes: 2328
 X-Received-Bytes: 2481
 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1257294123
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:15768
 
 > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 13:53:37 -0500, retrowavelength
 > <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
 >
 >>> On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:36:35 -0500, retrowavelength
 >>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
 >>>
 >>>>> begin 644 BK27XB7.jpg
 >>>>>
 >>>>> Attachment decoded: BK27XB7.jpg
 >>>>> `
 >>>>> end
 >>>>
 >>>>Harriet Dare looks like a model that I thought resembled Sandra
 >>>>Marnelle & had as a "maybe marnelle."  Now I guess we have to figure
 >>>>out if those are different models or two names for the same model.
 >>>>That posted picture can be seen in pics YA-444, YA-445.
 >>>
 >>>>begin 644 Sandra Marnelle YA-444_(061863).JPG
 >>>
 >>> Thanks, two of those were new to me!  In my opinion Harriet
 >>> and Sandra are the same model.
 >>
 >>Thanks for that confirmation. I was kinda dreading having to figure
 >>out how to tell Marnelle from Dare.  :-)
 >
 > You're welcome, rwl.  I have a "maybe marnelle" too (attached),
 > but I think her nose is just not right.
 >
 > RR
 >
 
 I remember seeing her & didn't think it was Marnelle. The SB-83 number was
 a new one. I had her few pics files as CB-75 matches.
 
 --rwl
 
 | 
 
 |