Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Mike Sharona <comrade.2000REMOVE@REMOVEyahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: (Anita Hendrix) anita-hendrix-18.jpg (1/1) 5 7
Sender: Mike Sharona
Message-ID: <3j5uvc58mvaa4b7jkhj3ifn86t2q8qdbcp@4ax.com>
References: <1K6dnd2fgebZZ2TEnZ2dnUU7-LXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <BOudnZ9WnsxYkWfEnZ2dnUU7-SHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 06:48:20 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 1601
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1684673057
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:13816
On Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:04:53 -0500, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>> http://www.avg.com
>> begin 644 anita-hendrix-18.jpg
>>
>> Attachment decoded: anita-hendrix-18.jpg
>> `
>> end
>
>This model is seen in sets CB-24, H-84, NC-29, X-L-60, X-L-62, XXH-34, XXH-
>38, Y-129, Y-130.
>
>I've never been convinced that this is Anita Hendrix. I know it has been
>claimed at myarchives & perhaps suggested here. If a skin dots analysis has
>any value, the CB-24 lady is not Anita Hendrix of RE-9 & plywood
>background sets.
>
>--rwl
I always thought that Anita Hendricks (RE-9) and Anita Hendrix (XL-60)
were two separate entities. But, I am old and easily confused.
|
|
 anita-hendrix-18.jpg (1/1) 5 7')){kind=link}