> On Sun, 03 Sep 2017 17:01:12 -0500, retrowavelength
> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:08:01 -0500, retrowavelength
>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 22:04:26 -0500, retrowavelength
>>>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:36:07 -0500, retrowavelength
>>>>>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:59690A25.1040006 @yahoo.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --rwl
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nothing to contribute this time, except my initial reaction to
>>>>>>>>> this pic was Bonnie Logan.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>There will probably be a number of these that are either actual
>>>>>>>>alternate names for models (& I haven't connected the dots) or
>>>>>>>>some may turn out to be claims by sellers, etc., that are bogus.
>>>>>>>>No way for me to be sure, but the group can discuss them & maybe
>>>>>>>>arrive at a conclusion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>--rwl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I always thought it was Bonnie as well. This image also
>>>>>>> appeared in Sir Knight Vol 2 No 11.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Umm, what name was it that I sent? These older posts seem to be
>>>>>>rolled off my provider (yeah, what's up with that).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>--rwl
>>>>>
>>>>> Wanda Jackson.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Andrea Jackson (attach)? I looked at the sent folder & didn't see a
>>>>Wanda (or I think I didn't).
>>>>
>>>>--rwl
>>>
>>> Yes. Andrea Jackson. Wanda Jackson was a musciican. At any rate,
>>> the same image also appeard in Sir Knight Vol 2 No 11.
>>>
>>
>>Was it also identified as Andrea or as Bonnie? I'd like to see it if
>>it's with Bonnie's name attached to it. I only have the cover page for
>>that issue so far. Thanks!!
>>
>>--rwl
>
> I've attached the images from Sir Knight. No mention of Bonnie Logan
> but she does look like Bonnie to me.
>
Thanks for sending that & I'm sorry I'm so late saying so.
--rwl
|
|