> On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:08:01 -0500, retrowavelength
> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 22:04:26 -0500, retrowavelength
>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:36:07 -0500, retrowavelength
>>>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:59690A25.1040006 @yahoo.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --rwl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nothing to contribute this time, except my initial reaction to
>>>>>>> this pic was Bonnie Logan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There will probably be a number of these that are either actual
>>>>>>alternate names for models (& I haven't connected the dots) or
>>>>>>some may turn out to be claims by sellers, etc., that are bogus.
>>>>>>No way for me to be sure, but the group can discuss them & maybe
>>>>>>arrive at a conclusion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>--rwl
>>>>>
>>>>> I always thought it was Bonnie as well. This image also appeared
>>>>> in Sir Knight Vol 2 No 11.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Umm, what name was it that I sent? These older posts seem to be
>>>>rolled off my provider (yeah, what's up with that).
>>>>
>>>>--rwl
>>>
>>> Wanda Jackson.
>>>
>>
>>Andrea Jackson (attach)? I looked at the sent folder & didn't see a
>>Wanda (or I think I didn't).
>>
>>--rwl
>
> Yes. Andrea Jackson. Wanda Jackson was a musciican. At any rate,
> the same image also appeard in Sir Knight Vol 2 No 11.
>
Was it also identified as Andrea or as Bonnie? I'd like to see it if it's
with Bonnie's name attached to it. I only have the cover page for that
issue so far. Thanks!!
--rwl
|
|