| 
| Re: Name Game Part 9, more names and faces - 3 attachments |  |  | retrowavelength (retrowavelength@yahoo.com) | 2017/08/28 12:32 |  | 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:32:27 -0500
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
 Subject: Re: Name Game Part 9, more names and faces - 3 attachments
 From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
 References: <59A04B0A.4020403@yahoo.com> <59A05723.4000202@yahoo.com> <XnsA7DD57D9C9109roakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131> <F5mdnerTYoxAgz7EnZ2dnUU7-LmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <XnsA7DF5C094B5BCroakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131>
 User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
 Message-ID: <-5idnQVjxoQm_DnEnZ2dnUU7-IlQAAAA@giganews.com>
 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:32:27 -0500
 Lines: 38
 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
 X-Trace: sv3-WUJqiXvb6JMc7sNrqUvAnX8sYS0Mz3UcFBmOpef9yYUbtzw9ROkiYjVgTqf1EshJl9JFcC57D2ql8T5!5l9Sg8RuF/2ZQ9rodPgmKYpBfUWaDMafzwnCz7/w2/5TX0LaEuMoIZ/BA8NCuUhKtzFUVUTh6lw=
 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
 X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
 X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 X-Original-Bytes: 2059
 X-Received-Bytes: 2181
 X-Received-Body-CRC: 940230785
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:13298
 
 > retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in
 > news:F5mdnerTYoxAgz7EnZ2dnUU7-LmdnZ2d@giganews.com:
 >
 >>> retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in
 >>> news:59A05723.4000202 @yahoo.com:
 >>>
 >>>> --rwl
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> I've seen it claimed that this is Linda Gamble, playmate of the month
 >>> in April 1960 and subsequently playmate of the year.
 >>>
 
 >>>
 >>
 >> Some of my pics of her do have tags that a seller claimed the name
 > Linda
 >> Gamble. I've only one Gamble pic that isn't suitable for detailed
 >> comparisons.
 >>
 >> --rwl
 >
 >
 >
 > A couple of pics attached.  I don't know how much better they are for
 > comparison - I am still ambivalent on the ID.
 >
 > 03 and 08 are close (but I inclided 05 also because it is my favourite)
 >
 
 >
 
 Thanks! Yep, I'd buy that's the same person. :-)
 
 --rwl
 
 | 
 
 |  |