| 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:02:25 -0500
 From: MtnRgr
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
 Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:02:25 -0600
 Message-ID: <2017071707022514479-@news.giganews.com>
 References: <596BC7E7.7060301@yahoo.com>
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
 Subject: Re: Terri Burton claimed
 User-Agent: Unison/2.1.10
 Lines: 22
 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
 X-Trace: sv3-PtFSM1YkaKwDp8MfvhwnrzpuWuGGeG15lNwWX0hHkJ6m632C4lz/ow+L7DnSEverw9vnkeZfF3CvoyW!Ot0AiSXSfBOGFyrP0MklAIQUpNEQ/uTRlwHeSy6J3G5HZXEmlDc0vafjesmNs6K/+o8=
 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
 X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
 X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
 X-Original-Bytes: 1616
 X-Received-Bytes: 1738
 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1317366740
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:13148
 
 On 2017-07-16 20:09:11 +0000, retrowavelength said:
 
 > Did I post this already?  If I did, I failed to make a note of it.
 >
 > Anyway, there were a batch of pics offered at fleabay that were claimed
 > to be Terri Burton but didn't look like her to me.  Attached is a
 > comparative Terri (as I know her) and the claimed pics, along with the
 > offered pics. Would like to know if anyone disagrees with me.
 >
 > --rwl
 >
 > <image>
 > <image>
 > <image>
 > <image>
 > <image>
 
 While it is nice to get new pics I've never seen, she is definately not
 Terri Burton.
 
 Does anyone have more of this gal?
 
 
 | 
 
 |