alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintagePrev. Next
Re: Terri Burton claimed
() 2017/07/17 07:02

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:02:25 -0500
From: MtnRgr
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:02:25 -0600
Message-ID: <2017071707022514479-@news.giganews.com>
References: <596BC7E7.7060301@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: Terri Burton claimed
User-Agent: Unison/2.1.10
Lines: 22
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-PtFSM1YkaKwDp8MfvhwnrzpuWuGGeG15lNwWX0hHkJ6m632C4lz/ow+L7DnSEverw9vnkeZfF3CvoyW!Ot0AiSXSfBOGFyrP0MklAIQUpNEQ/uTRlwHeSy6J3G5HZXEmlDc0vafjesmNs6K/+o8=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1616
X-Received-Bytes: 1738
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1317366740
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:13148

On 2017-07-16 20:09:11 +0000, retrowavelength said:

> Did I post this already?  If I did, I failed to make a note of it.
>
> Anyway, there were a batch of pics offered at fleabay that were claimed
> to be Terri Burton but didn't look like her to me.  Attached is a
> comparative Terri (as I know her) and the claimed pics, along with the
> offered pics. Would like to know if anyone disagrees with me.
>
> --rwl
>
> <image>
> <image>
> <image>
> <image>
> <image>

While it is nice to get new pics I've never seen, she is definately not
Terri Burton.

Does anyone have more of this gal?


Next Prev. Article List         Favorite