>
I'm inclined to a slightly more cynical opinion. Not changing the print
was probably the easiest way to get the mag to the newstand
>
I think you're onto the most likely explanation. Similarly, I've seen
identical model spreads in magazines with only the publication name
changed. Perhaps they were driven by deadlines with shortages in cash &
help, so they invented a way to move forward with what they had.
>I am impressed that rwl discovered this. (Great work!)
Thank you! <blushing>
>Don't condemn me for this opinion. I really am a nice enough fellow.
--rwl
|
|