alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintagePrev. Next
Re: My Archieves mining
retrowavelength (retrowavelength@yahoo.com) 2016/12/09 13:53

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 14:53:37 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: My Archieves mining
From: retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com>
References: <2016120907124558634-@news.giganews.com> <2dvl4cthb8m3dr5f9eusfuqlb8aaa9aull@4ax.com>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Message-ID: <kvydndRp_ZdMhNbFnZ2dnUU7-afNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 14:53:37 -0600
Lines: 32
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-gDXuuA5BlV3PqH8lRkjvNksiplW1jOSrum2KmzxyfXKW80sYZtZjir/olu7bv9Xn6fP03TY3WW4WTJg!GjUv3Iq7lMMCIuu002+zn0/xDvdH812nOUzFiI/6vHkR2hWrNG0cvI7DF80onJ2xtkQooomSvq8=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2354
X-Received-Bytes: 2445
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4058911916
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:12232

> On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 07:12:45 -0700, MtnRgr wrote:
>
>>I spent several days going through the MyArchieves Golden Age misc
>>folder, all 30,000 plus pics. I will start posting what I found and
>>downloaded over the next week or two. I want to spread it out some to
>>give everyone a chance to comment.
>
> Asking for comments?  Okay.
>
> Please don't dump myarchivesnet files here.
>
> Many of the names at myarchivesnet are unconfirmed by anything.  Many
> of the names at myarchivesnet are just plain wrong.  Many of the files
> at myarchivesnet are downsized adulterated versions of files that were
> originally posted to this newsgroup.
>
> Targeted posting of particular images found at myarchivesnet, for a
> certain model, or a certain magazine, or a setting, or set ID, would
> be fine.  But please don't dump myarchivesnet files here.
>
> That's my comment.  Fwiw.
>
> RR

I agree myarchives seems to get it wrong a lot & any IDs from there need to
be with a grain of salt. They do have a lot of degraded pics but sometimes
some good ones. If many of their files are posted & we are to give them a
vetting then the posting needs to be done rather slowly. Working thru a
batch like today's might take a few days before everyone had found them,
looked them over & found any proofs to go with them.

--rwl

Follow-ups:12345
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite