Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Rodney Reason <ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: Any ID on girl in 68C set?
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 21:44:49 +0000
Message-ID: <sr1c3c92sodfccccgus3qe9m2bsba5s58p@4ax.com>
References: <XnsA6C9592B23314roakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131> <2016112306541846951-@news.giganews.com> <5rcb3ch7sv7gsardjll479q5gnvn8v8as8@4ax.com> <7LqdnWb3uKkvcKjFnZ2dnUU7-f_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 27
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 31d07bf6.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=E1<5V1a26jVI56`<E^G]B^L?0kYOcDh@Z72F7U6B]WgToPXXUkhlTIQ^O<T2lXi3>R[L7L?TjjlgR^1LWFHKjH7SB95S\cnZjiY
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2358204837
X-Received-Bytes: 2170
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:12113
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:27:46 -0600, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Also, Ruth Egnor was aka Dagmar, and I can't see Dagmar in any of
>> the 68C pictures. Dagmar had a slight chin dimple and this girl
>> is well rounded. All over!
>
>Dagmar the TV star? There was also Dagmar Blair the showgirl. TV's Dagmar
>was a big girl & 68c doesn't look like a big girl. I think I might see
>Dagmar Blair's nose in the set but this is a more candid view than most of
>my Blair pics, so harder to make judgement for me. Could be it's yet
>another Dagmar??
I was the one who brought 'Dagmar' into it today, so no, I don't
think so.
The real name of Dagmar the TV star was Virginia Ruth Egnor if
you can believe the WWW. And the names of your files from the
myarchives site seems to indicate they got the info from this
newsgroup. Circular reasoning.
It's hard to believe two Dagmars from that period, but that is
apparently irrefutable. I wonder if they ever mud-wrestled for
the name. But two 'Ruth Egnor'? Maybe if it had been Johnson
or Smith!
RR
|
|