Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Rodney Reason <ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
Subject: Re: Still More Sets - File 006 of 117 - 00003.jpg (1/1) - 67B (1755).jpg
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:03:15 +0000
Message-ID: <ibdprb563h7piud06lidrffqkia7juhj12@4ax.com>
References: <Jb2vz.599608$sC.275454@fx42.am4>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 18
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 225a4dfd.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=7nLcKl?6ca8hZ4>`7BGPo4L?0kYOcDh@:T7U22f;g0<5=eF@V9c2j60?n7olhF9dh1I0>660baIQ0cA^dVRd``;5K01Zgd<T0X6
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2575155744
X-Received-Bytes: 1751
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:11370
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:17:43 +0100, "fredhogan"
<fredhogan@not-here.com> wrote:
>many of these sets were orininally posted with the names of the models involved but - as far as i've seen - none of those names have been included in these current repostings.
>
>if that is actually so - i wonder what on earth was the point of excluding the names.
Hi fred. Almost everything Stanislaus \Dukie Boy\ Kovaleski
posts is new for me, at least the files themselves if not every
image conglomerated within (and many of those images are also
new (for me)). I've found he very seldom reposts material
unintentionally.
I don't know where he gets the material but it seems to me that
he posts it bare, with very little or no processing. Maybe that
would explain the lack of names you're questioning.
RR
|
|
 - 67B (1755).jpg')){kind=link}