On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 01:51:25 -0600, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Only had one of the one you already have.
Oh well, thanks for checking, rwl.
And of course, the 4X4 originals I mentioned are actually 2X2,
which is what I was thinking but conflated with X4. Duh.
RR
|
|