Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!news.astraweb.com!border3.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!peer01.fr7!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.fr7!fx38.am4.POSTED!not-for-mail  
From: "fredhogan" <fredhogan@nothere.com>  
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage  
References: <ySuSy.2130443$gz.338572@fx40.am4> <571B2E99.9030003@yahoo.com> <%OGSy.1197833$py.1002591@fx43.am4> <572114B4.1090204@yahoo.com>  
In-Reply-To: <572114B4.1090204@yahoo.com>  
Subject: Re: 114 - 13 pics  
Lines: 1  
MIME-Version: 1.0  
Content-Type: text/plain;  
 format=flowed;  
 charset="iso-8859-1";  
 reply-type=response  
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit  
X-Priority: 3  
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal  
Importance: Normal  
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308  
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308  
Message-ID: <13cUy.151489$3X3.134295@fx38.am4>  
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.27.240.17  
X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com  
X-Trace: 1461800253 86.27.240.17 (Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:37:33 UTC)  
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:37:33 UTC  
Organization: virginmedia.com  
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:37:30 +0100  
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1852523175  
X-Received-Bytes: 1997  
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:10021  
  
retrowavelength wrote : Let's see if I have any of the Starlet sets. I have  
some pics with the following numbers in the Starlet format:  
  
113-1, -2, -9  
114-1  
118-2  
  
rwl - many thanks for checking - alas i do already have copies of all of  
those pictures.  
  
its nice for a change to have pictures individually numbered - as one can  
then say at once if something is wanted or not without any sending of  
attachments.  
  
the master of the individually numbered picture was of course  irving klaw -  
every one of whose pictures was given its own number.  
  
so when - as in your other post about the various 'BP' pictures we see  
numbers duplicated - we know at once that those are not klaw numbers - even  
if  the pictures to which they have been attached were actually his.  
  
i will write separately about those pictures and - if possible - will give  
details of any of their original IDs i am able to spot.  
  
fredhogan  
  
  
  
  
  
 |  
  
 |