In reply to "Esteban@elMariachi.mex" who wrote the following:
> Rabid, don't get me wrong. You do some amazing work. I delete picture
> files smaller than 30 kb, because in today's hi-def world, the quality just
> isn't there. So if the "deep archive" is an old archive, I suggest you
> screen for quality, too. Before 2005 there was a lot of well-intentioned,
> but badly presented material, simply because of limitations of the
> technology at the time. I'm not a historian, so others may disagree.
Thanks Esteban.
Agreed, and that's why the deep archive has remained unvisited for so long.
Trying to gague interest because it does have some gems not seen for a long
time, but i'm not going through the trouble sifting for them unless people are
interested.
--
----------------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v7.0 Final
Free Newsreader @ http://www.newsleecher.com/
------------------------------- ----- ---- -- -
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.fetish.latex/1283', 'Re: Newer tumblr daze - may have to unlock the deep archive if there is any interest - "tumblr_ll88s1iN1H1qetydwo1_540.jpg"')){kind=link}