Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Buck <Buck@Scanners.Inc>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller
Subject: Re: SBEWP_Astrud A - Termali 010 [MA].jpg [9/9] - yEnc (1/2)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:05:13 -0500
Organization: Scanners Inc
Lines: 76
Message-ID: <8njnvddi18244232kmo4koffnuh30r5mrv@4ax.com>
References: <pt3ndd72jjq@news2.newsguy.com> <2i6bvdlaelnlpq9okvkmtto3gfnebc7i4i@4ax.com> <bs5dvdd0s4v14l48d3rcsonkbnha2jsr56@4ax.com> <6cogvdt5bdimqm959o9gjjkukbke2nutov@4ax.com> <k18lvdhffi7ab9ij4fck6kqo6fre74m3c1@4ax.com> <cm1mvdph78bukr4md9ufak1c2eb82eqb8f@4ax.com> <llbmvd5ekpr9kfjvsq1vdkd89om3krhph7@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p5ca0af2c9b687f1d0480c69885a92122a172c99a0b96c88b.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
X-Received-Bytes: 4691
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2643017494
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller:9854
On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 23:37:32 +0000, Moxy@127.0.0.1 posted: "Re:
SBEWP_Astrud A - Termali 010 [MA].jpg [9/9] - yEnc (1/2)"
>On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 14:51:25 -0600, SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 08:45:28 -0500, Buck <Buck@Scanners.Inc> wrote:
>>
>><snipped>
>>
>>>My desktop monitor defaults to 1920x1080 resolution so I tend to use
>>>it. With all the different sizes of monitors, laptops, tablets and
>>>other devices, they each have there best resolution. I'm stuck on 1080
>>>because it fills my entire screen. 1920x1200 and most any other
>>>resolution have black band on the sides of the screen, which is
>>>annoying to me. But I put up with it because not everyone, or should I
>>>say everyone has their own preferences based on the equipment they are
>>>using.
>>>
>>>I'm not a gamer so I can't relate to the issues there.
>>>
>>>Way back when I use to resize images to fit my screen. Now if I like
>>>it I keep it regardless of the resolution/dimension. The way I see it
>>>now, there will always be somebody that doesn't like something you've
>>>uploaded. Some people will bitch about anything, including if they are
>>>being hung with a new rope. Instead of fixing it to their needs they
>>>would rather complain about it. My way of thinking is if it doesn't
>>>fit your preferences then don't download or save it. I guess that's
>>>just to simple for some people to understand.
>>>
>>>Sorry for the short rant!
>>
>> I wouldn't expect you to do anything less; I do the same thing
>>too. It's hard or impossible to not crop too much to the point of it
>>not looking good anymore on some though.
>> That's another reason I'm putting Glamour Girls on hold. I
>>started out doing it just for me. Then, knowing everyone else is
>>using 1080 monitors, I started doing some for them. I'm doing it for
>>two monitors, you know, so that's threee sizes. Some of the guys know
>>I'm putting the majority of the sets in this group so...what's the
>>point? I did 99% of those with Irfanview - easy-peasy.
>> Because of how things are right now, and it could change, 2/3
>>of what I can get fall into the realm of this group. One of the
>>gentlemen in .bh steered me here...and the rest is History.
>> 1080 has become the norm whether I like it or not. I'm not
>>complaining about the rope, my friend. In fact, I suspect more and
>>more software, images and the like will cease supporting 16:10. It's
>>extra work now for them too, with little payback.
>> Ah, well, things are what they are. So it goes.
>
>My 'selfish' opinion is that images should not be resized (read
>reduced in quality), unless marked so. It is dissapointing to
>download a set, see the cover shot say 21MP, and find the set <2MP. It
>doesn't look good on moderns card/monitor combo's.
>
>Whenever I upload such sets, I try to make it clear they are not as
>advertised by making the res clear in the indexes/coversheets.
>
>The resizing problem does not seem to be an issue in EarlMiller, but
>is rampant on other groups.I feel a Hegre 80MP post coming on.....
I don't touch/resize the sets. Like those posted here. I upload them
the same size as I downloaded them at.
What we are referring to are single images that come in oddball sizes
that are used as wallpaper. If I use an image from a set for the
purpose of making a wallpaper image, it will always be a copy of the
image. The original stays the original size and in the set.
Actually, this exchange should have taken place in
ab.pictures.wallpaper.duplicates - Sorry for the confusion!
SL - I've been considering doing a wallpaper set of non nude Glamour.
But that is still in the thinking stage.
|
|
')){kind=link}