On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:00:16 -0500, Buck <Buck@Scanners.Inc> wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:49:01 -0600, SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
>posted: "Re: SBEWP_Astrud A - Termali 010 [MA].jpg [9/9] - yEnc
>(1/2)"
>
>>On 21 Nov 2018 13:43:09 GMT, Buck@Scanners.Inc (Buck) wrote:
>>
>> SBEWP = something, something, Erotic, Wall,Paper. ???
>> Clue me in on the SB part. :-)
>
>SBEWP = Spy Bird Erotic Wallpaper
>
>I was looking through some DVD's for regular non nude wallpaper and I
>found these. I had totally forgotten all about them. Some years ago, I
>don't remember the group, a poster (SpyBird) started posting nude
>wallpaper. I had planned to use them, but the frequency that the
>grandkids showing up at the house put a halt to those plans and they
>ended up on the DVD. S now that I rediscovered them I figured I'd
>share them. By the way there is about 7,000 of them.
>
>Does that help?
Sure does.
What I find iteresting, then and now, is how 16:10 slowly
disappeared and people jumped onboard whole-heartedly and with both
feet onto 16:9. I still don't completely understand.
I bought, a long time ago, a monitor @1680x1050 and I like
that perspective. #1 After experiencing what I have, why would I
want to go shorter-and-wider? A long, long time ago, some movies came
in cinematic view(I think is what it was called). You had a wider
view, but black borders on the top and bottom. I don't think too many
people wanted that at home, including me. And that is what 1080
always reminds me of. :-/
#2 It's easier for a video card to push the smaller amount of
pixels. 1,764,000 vs. 2,073,600. A difference of 309,600 pixels.
That has kept me, I'm sure, of having to update my gaming pc...and
there's NEVER a good time to buy/build a new computer. There's always
some new tech in the pipeline you'll want.
My point: "What took you so fucking long?!" Don't worry
about those 1680's. I still like 'em. :-)
|
|
')){kind=link}