Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: pretty-virgins.com _contactsheets [01/30] "PrettyVirgins-0001-index_001.jpg"
From: Randy Wang <r@ndy.wang>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller
Message-ID: <110320181152264688%r@ndy.wang>
References: <F5apC.119174$By.48123@fx01.am4> <qgbaadhgcih5cb2ft1pp1mp4o56cbdmaj7@4ax.com> <110320181119446969%r@ndy.wang>
Organization: Extreme Spurts Channel
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-Archive: Yes
Lines: 16
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 16:52:27 UTC
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 11:52:26 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1642
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4095319101
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller:7113
Following up to my own post, after finding a bit of corroboration
elsewhere ... yes, apparently the Pretty Virgins name was associated
with the studio "LS-Models", or LSM, which was well known and highly
collectible underage stuff (and therefore it was also well known to
various fascist Enforcer types whose occupation is hassling,
persecuting, and prosecuting certain uploaders of images and vids).
PV is probably a special case, because it could be that all of *those*
models from that imprint were adults at the time (and in some countries
the age of consent is lower than 18 ... not that it makes any
difference in the U.S., because the local laws always apply). So my
general warning was correct: it would be a good idea *not* to post
anything further from that brand name, even when the model was
obviously an adult, just because of the potential hassles of the name
and its connections.
HTH.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller/7113h', 'Re: pretty-virgins.com _contactsheets [01/30] "PrettyVirgins-0001-index_001.jpg"')){kind=link}