Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Subject: Re: pretty-virgins.com _contactsheets [01/30] "PrettyVirgins-0001-index_001.jpg"
From: Randy Wang <r@ndy.wang>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller
Message-ID: <110320181119446969%r@ndy.wang>
References: <F5apC.119174$By.48123@fx01.am4> <qgbaadhgcih5cb2ft1pp1mp4o56cbdmaj7@4ax.com>
Organization: Extreme Spurts Channel
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-Archive: Yes
Lines: 14
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 16:19:44 UTC
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 11:19:44 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1474
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2376811374
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller:7112
In article <qgbaadhgcih5cb2ft1pp1mp4o56cbdmaj7@4ax.com>,
<Moxy@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> Not sure what to make of these. I have a collection of 380 sets,
> 7.5GB in total. Was about to sent them to the bit bucket, but decided
> to create these samples and put the question out there.
The name rings a sort of generic or general alarm bell here ... I'm not
familiar with that stuff, but wasn't PV one of the imprints, or
sub-studio names, of one of those Russian kiddy-pr0n outfits that got
busted years ago? But maybe I'm wrong and all of those models in the
PV sets are strictly over 18. Don't know (and I confess that I haven't
bothered to look at all of the indexes that you posted, only some of
'em). Unless you're positive that they're all 18+, I wouldn't post.
|
|