Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller:12472
Path: news.nzbot.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx43.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller
Subject: Re: 8/25_1 180of570] - "Riley Reid & Gabbie Carter_BelowTheBelt (1).jpg"
Message-ID: <n1g5met0oqjvcaglug79n6uf9gu7mk79u8@4ax.com>
References: <Zvw8F.50776$CO2.22045@usenetxs.com> <250820191147450212%abuse@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 60
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 17:20:36 UTC
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 12:20:32 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 3186
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3814000723
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 11:47:45 -0500, Randy Wang
<abuse@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>In article <Zvw8F.50776$CO2.22045@usenetxs.com>,
>SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8> wrote:
>
>> =ybegin line=128 size=90735 name=Riley Reid & Gabbie Carter_BelowTheBelt
>
>FYI:
>
><https://torrentfreak.com/copyright-troll-files-over-1000-piracy-lawsuits-in-half-a-year/>
>
>[quote]
>... The adult entertainment production company Strike 3 Holdings,
>which distributes its adult videos via the Blacked, Tushy, and Vixen
>websites, takes the crown. In the first six months of this year,
>976 new cases in the same period.
>[/quote]
>
>That's about videos via Bittorrent, not pic sets via Usenet, but
>even so, I think Blacked, Tushy, Vixen, and X-Art are brand names
>to stay away from.
>
>[quote]
>The second most litigious rightsholder is Malibu Media, another
>adult entertainment outfit. The company, known for its X-Art brand,
>has been an established player in US courts for a few years.
>During the first half of 2019 it filed 337 new cases, which is
>down from 681 last year.
>[/quote]
>
>The good news is that material from the studio "Perfect 10"
>(assuming that you have any) would seem to be fair game now,
>unless its new owner, whoever the fuck that is (I haven't
>bothered to search for it), decides to be a legal PITA about it.
>
><https://torrentfreak.com/copyright-trolls-intellectual-property-goes-up-for-sale-to-pay-giganews-170308/>
>
>and (later: Perfect 10 is desperate)
>
><https://torrentfreak.com/perfect-10-takes-giganews-supreme-court-says-worse-megaupload-170906/>
>
>and (later: the Supremes say "Get the fuck outa here")
>
><https://copyrightalliance.org/copyright-law/copyright-cases/perfect-10-v-giganews/>
>
>[quote]
>Procedural History
>Court: Ninth Circuit
>Status: Supreme Court denied certiorari. (December 4, 2017) Ninth Circuit
>non-taxable costs. (January 29, 2018)
>[/quote]
I don't know what to think about this. How these image sets
are obtained from wherever, I have no idea. Am I sharing what's been
shared, what's been shared, what's been shared...I have no way to
tell. I am clueless.
|
|