On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:13:02 -0500, SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
posted: "Re: femjoy_Donna T - Premiere_000.jpg [001/119] - yEnc
(1/1)"
>On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 05:39:05 -0400, Buck <Buck@Scanners.Inc> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 22:52:51 -0500, SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
>>posted: "Re: femjoy_Donna T - Premiere_000.jpg [001/119] - yEnc
>>(1/1)"
>>
>>>On 20 Aug 2019 10:42:43 GMT, Buck@Scanners.Inc (Buck) wrote:
>>>
>>> She has one slight flaw, but I like her.
>>
>>Good - So what's the flaw?
>
> That little mole or whatever between her breasts and
>belly-button. I abhor "protrusions"(moles, warts, tags, etc.). Hers
>isn't as bad as, regretfully, a lot of others.
> If you want to suck on somebody's wart that'll just have to be
>your thing. And I'm not saying that's what this is here.
> You see more and more girls with these things. A lot of them
>are just downright disgusting. Sorry, I just can't help it. If the
>girl is merely ok/mediocre and I see one? Blurp--->Reycle Bin! My
>eyes just go right to them and I can't get past it. I've even gone to
>the trouble of erasing them in Paint for an otherwise fine babe.
That's the way I feel about the ones with arm pit hairs and hairy legs
- DISGUSTING. They are the biggest and fastest turn offs for me.
> I post a lot of shit I don't keep, probably just like you do.
>So you know well the covers are going to be, usually, among the best
>shots(pics) and if only one pic is photoshopped, it'll be that one.
>Having to judge a lot of sets I want by the covers leads to a lot of
>FAILS. That's ok, maybe someone else wil get some mileage out of
>them.
> I'm awfully critical of the girls. The Glamour Studios have
>become a catalog of the finest for me - or at least they should be -
>and I'm judging them as such. Maybe many here see EVERY gal that
>takes her clothes off as good. I'm culling the herd. ;-)
|
|
')){kind=link}