Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller
Subject: Re: femjoy_Mira M - Every Morning_000.jpg [001/125] - yEnc (1/1)
Message-ID: <h3mg2etgckh9kbmovmffp2iv7b3te3hscc@4ax.com>
References: <q07rg591rqc@news4.newsguy.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 16
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 05:45:42 UTC
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 23:45:40 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 1408
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1812594300
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller:10202
On 29 Dec 2018 13:06:13 GMT, Buck@Scanners.Inc (Buck) wrote:
I know Mira. She's not a new girl.
Ranking: she's a notch prettier than Galina(facially).
Breasts? A notch below.
"So where does that leave her?" Hmmm. I'll have to study
this set some more. I've already looked at it twice. ;-)
I do know they used way too much make-up on her. Almost to
the point where it looks like she could just be sunburned, but I'm not
buying that excuse cause she probably had her clothes off for as much
time.
These European girls; they're a different lot anyway. But you
know as well as I do that some girls are w-a-y so much better at using
make-up than others. Most probably you see a make-up artist/tech on
these professional shoots. Who knows what happened here? Verdict:
FAIL.
|
|
')){kind=link}