Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: astrawebfan <astra@web.fan>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.comics
Message-ID: <2018070516475723103-astra@webfan>
References: <2018070422520483268-symm@nowhereorg>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: Other color effort looks to be from a bonus page; no idea what issue - "13.jpg" yEnc
User-Agent: Unison/2.1.10
Lines: 64
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 20:47:57 UTC
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 16:47:57 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 2953
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3843988584
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.comics:4922
On 2018-07-05 05:52:04 +0000, symm said:
> On 2018-07-04 22:29:26 +0000, John Smallberries said:
>
>
>> I've seen this before, somewhere, but I remember it as b&w. Hm.
>>
>>
>> Anyway, there's this: Better, no, but different -- at least the coloring is.
>>
>>
>> https://www.ebay.com/itm/Marvel-Amazing-Fantasy-No-15-Cover-Spider-Man-Swinging-Poster/132007861097?hash=item1ebc481b69:m:m3-HgEqZIFit8oEaORXDhdg
>>
>>
>>
>> Which suggests to me that it was indeed printed somwhere in b&w and at
>> least two different people (or groups) colored it.
>>
>>
>> Being sold as a poster also suggests that Marvel may have licensed it
>> but I find that a little dubious. The actual cover is so iconic and I
>> don't see any copyright info on the print.
>
>
> Looks like it was printed as a "bonus feature" page inside at least one
> comic. The images I've found are small and no reference to the issue
> they're from.
>
>
> Interesting inside baseball on Spider-man creation that I hadn't read
> before (especially a sketch that purposrts to show Kirby's original
> design that was rejected -- way different thanexpected when I read
> about it earlier):
>
>
> http://kirbymuseum.org/blogs/dynamics/2011/08/29/comments-on-lees-how-i-invented-spider-man-article/
>
>
>
> The alternate Ditko cover was used as a variant cover for Spider-man
> #700. Yet another re-coloring effort that I'll post in a bit.
>
>
> All three look like Marvel's released as variant covers, bonus feature
> internal page or "poster" from their website at some point (at least
> based on the coloring).
>
>
> I've seen similiar recoloring efforts for 1st Thor appearance digital
> reprints, etc. Feels a little like Turner back in the 80's with
> bastardized colorization of classic B&W movies.
>
>
> I did find a B&W print scan of the alternate Ditko cover in a less
> sucky res. Obviously not original art scan but in the same style.
> Wonder what that was from. Will post as well.
>
>
The version "presented here in color for the very first time" is from
Marvel Tales 137. Bluerobe posted a poor quality scan for PostalPops on
a.b.p.comics.dcp a few years ago, still accessible. Original copies are
cheap and worth owning just for that cover. (says me)
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.comics/4922h', 'Re: Other color effort looks to be from a bonus page; no idea what issue - "13.jpg" yEnc')){kind=link}