On 2018-03-12 02:36:46 +0000, astrawebfan said:
> On 2018-03-12 01:32:23 +0000, symm said:
>
>> On 2018-03-11 21:35:32 +0000, astrawebfan said:
>>
>>> Thanks so much, symm! Do you have more early Conan scans by teachbug
>>> and woodman? I have #44 and a bunch after that but nothing earlier than
>>> this copy of 11 you just posted. I'd appreciate any more you have to
>>> share.
>>
>> Can you post #44 & any more Conan Woodman you have not in the list?
>
> Oh wow! I never knew Woodman scanned so many. The weird thing is I have
> a bunch of them up to #99 but very few of the ones you list below. The
> only issues we both have are 59, 60, and 62.
>
> I'm posting all 23 scans I have that you don't and humbly request you
> post everything you listed below.
>
> FYI, Mon-El also responded to my request by posting all the scan HE had
> over in a.b.comics which includes MORE issues you're missing -- 1, 5,
> 8, 11, and 16 -- so go grab those for your collection too.
>
> Thank you symm and thanks to Mon-El too, if you're reading this!
>
Ended up with 118 Woodman (high quality) scans. :)
I also have 14 huge hi-res GCA-Empire scans (#172-185) if anyone wants them.
Man, the "hybrid" issues I found with digital re-colored interior pages
are HORRIBLE.
|
|