somebody <somebody@someplace.la> wrote in
news:wdKdnfXVMNhVOk7InZ2dnUU7-fednZ2d@giganews.com:
> Unless you're just keeping up a database, don't bother with it. The
> images are all -very- low quality, a lot of fakes, unsupported naming
> conventions, etc. Nearly all of them images are low quality magazine
> scans, some with huge banners bearing scanner's names.
>
>
Most of these pictures date back to the early days of the internet, when
the digital camera was in its infancy And home internet connections were by
dial-up telephone modems. As poor as these pictures look today, they were
about as good as they got at the time.
|
|