| 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail From: Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.celebrities
 Subject: Re: Janet Leigh
 Date: 23 Sep 2017 07:42:01 -0700
 Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
 Lines: 29
 Message-ID: <oq5rrp010mp@drn.newsguy.com>
 References: <rbjbsc5qd0eaodseld8e5jg2j672a1euli@4ax.com> <oq4r0l02jn7@drn.newsguy.com> <vcpcschof933vp3e0vth0mdrogjrrit298@4ax.com>
 NNTP-Posting-Host: p7c4e5eb19d18e52bc7283d11f7eff7b2909fbe277ca14e93.newsdawg.com
 User-Agent: Direct Read News 5.60
 X-Received-Bytes: 1237
 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1029136683
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.celebrities:1283
 
 In article <vcpcschof933vp3e0vth0mdrogjrrit298@4ax.com>, Sam Samcom says...
 >
 >On 22 Sep 2017 22:21:25 -0700, Miloch <Miloch_member@newsguy.com>
 >wrote:
 >
 >>In article <rbjbsc5qd0eaodseld8e5jg2j672a1euli@4ax.com>, Sam Samcom says...
 >>>
 >>>Was watching "Angels in the Outfield" even in 1951 ya can't hide big
 >>>tits
 >>
 >>
 >>Falsies...the blue convertible behind her has better 'headlights' than she
 >>does...at least they're real.
 >
 >
 >Ay first I thought she was Vera Ellen. I don't think Janet Leigh
 >needed fakes
 
 Back in those days they all wore padding...
 
 
 *
 
 
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>*
 
 
 | 
 
 |