Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.candydoll:1136
Path: news.nzbot.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!fx45.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Curious@nowhere.com
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.candydoll
Subject: Re: Question about Original Candydoll sets TIA
Message-ID: <98icae513d1ooq1897bvh2msis78r2h30a@4ax.com>
References: <v1fcaepsu98rsgf3q6prl9qv00teqdvg3u@4ax.com> <obudnQCWnpOCojvBnZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 17
X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 18:13:50 UTC
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 14:13:41 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 1749
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2248768352
On Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:30:07 -0500, "LuckyLu (LL)" <LuckyLu@Shang.hai>
wrote:
>
>On 04 Apr 2019 10:18 AM ,Curious@nowhere.com wrote:
>> Do any of the posters know what the highest set numbers were for the
>> original Candydolls?
>> For example the highest number set I have for Eva R is set 44.
>> Sharlotta S is set 33. And on and on.
>> Did they make any after this and I just missed them somewhere or is
>> that it?
>> Thanks for any help.
>While I don't have the answer for you at hand, I can direct you where to look for these types of questions. Some websites still exist, though they may be unnatended. But I've found doing a search on the wayback archives is far easier.
><https://archive.org/web/>
> LL
Thanks for the heads up Lucky. As an aside, I really appreciate your
continuing posts across the boards. Thanks again
|
|