On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:51:09 +0200 (CEST), Anonymous Remailer austria
wrote:
>Thanks for the YS csv. I did some sorting a couple of months ago and
>my results match yours with the exception of 3 sets which I am missing
>(ira11, olga12 & vera13).
>
>The Golden Spittoon index has been a very useful find although it's a pity
>the author(s) didn't include any csvs.
>Do you have any "work in progress" csvs for other sites as I can do some
>checks against mine to see if there are any anomalies.
>
>BTW how do you plan to handle the sets with multiple logos as GS didn't
>really address that issue.
>
>--
>Skydiver
>
Skydiver,
Oh geez, I really need to check back more often. I thought nobody was
interested in what I posted.
I do indeed have other work in progress. There have been a couple of small
changes made to Young Strawberry. The name of ira11 should have been
ira11l (that's a lower case "L"), and it now appears another gallery
belongs in YS, but one which I don't have. I redid the index somewhat too.
For one site, I have all that I could verify belongs, so the csv *may* be
complete for it - Plasma Girls. It contains one set more than the csv
issued last year by blazing-saddle sores, but we otherwise match.
For another site, I lack at least one set from completion - Photo Angels.
The original Grand Company logoed sets I put into a subfolder, and all the
BD logoed sets (including the relogoed GrC sets) were left in the main.
Whether this will work for other sites I can't yet tell since every site
seems to need it's own set of rules for organisation. I thank blazing-
saddle sores for his massive post last year of this site. I otherwise
would have had little more than the old Grand Company sets to work with.
The index for PhA has had some of the thumbs redone. Not all, but a bunch.
I wanted the logoes on the thumbs to match the sets they represented.
The last bit of work I did was with BD Sisters, but I'm faced with a
terrible lack of completion. I put together an index I believe has value,
but much of it remains unverified as to photo count since I just don't have
the sets to work with. The csv is marginally superior to the one issued by
CD since it's about half again as large, but it's still over 2200 entries
shy of a full house. That makes it less than two-thirds complete.
There is one conflict with CD over set2-000-004.jpg, a case where CD was
slipped a mickey.
For all four of the above sites, the matching indices were shamelessly
lifted from the Golden Spittoon Ltd. index and re-ordered to suit my own
sort preferences. Other changes were made at my discretion also. These
include adding additional sets known to belong, removing leading zeroes
from some set numbers which had been placed by the index author, changing
the color background, using a different logo image, and cataloguing the
number of pics in each gallery. Some of the styles in the html document
are my own.
The remaining three sites I collect are probably in worse shape than BD
Sisters. I'll post as I get organised. Please keep me posted on your
results so I can track down dicrepancies.
--
mr.bill
|
|