Hello Terrry. I would , as would many others, like to see some postings
from Photonymphets and Photololitas. Hopefully some generous person
will read this and post some. I have possibly the index you are
referring to. It states the name of the site with thumbnails
attached.....is that helpful?
Terry:
> Dear Mr Bill,
>
> I have come across your post from 2009-09-18 23:56:03 GMT (details
below). Unfortunately I have not been able to find the actual Index.
>
> Would you mind re-posting the index?
>
> Thanking you in advance
>
> T
>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Group,
>
> Let me state the obvious, "BD is a mess"!
>
> BD named the majority, if not all, of their photos 000-nnn.jpg.
>
> BD assigned no unique identifiers to their sets.
>
> It's only on the member pages that one had access to the folder names
for each set. Collectors long ago began using these folder names as set
identifiers.
>
> Let me state more of the obvious.
>
> It isn't possible to tell from a set folder name what site it came
from.
>
> It isn't generally possible to tell from a logo what site a set came
from. There are exceptions like Photololita & Photonymphets, which
became respectively, Photo Lo and Hot Girls Photos, but most sets have
no unique logo.
>
> BD used the same photo shoot for updates to different sites. Folder
names may have been similar or different. The number of photos and
their arrangement was likewise variable from site to site.
>
> BD sold photo sets to outside sites (MyFirstUndressing &
ShamelessLolita), then later reclaimed them for updates to their own
sites.
>
> BD combined prior sets into new ones for updates to their sites.
>
> Are there any questions as to why BD is a mess? I see no hands going
up.
>
> This index & csv were predicated on several sources. The first, an
index by an unknown benefactor known only as the Golden Spittoon Ltd.
index which was derived from site mirrors. The mirror for Young
Strawberry ended in November 2003, with previews good through December.
>
> The second, a p2p archive named "BD_Strawberry_CompleteSite_2003".
>
> Lastly, a 67 set, Young Strawberry usenet posting ending in March,
2004.
>
> After comparing these sources, set identifier names, and crcs from the
variously posted sets, I chose to do the following:
>
> 1.. To (re)name files strictly in accordance with the Golden Spittoon
index.
>
> 2.. To (re)order the index according to my own individual sort
preferences.
>
> 3.. To update the index to include the 4 or 5 newer sets the index
didn't catalog. (One was known to exist, but not which of three it
was.)
>
> 4.. To remake all the thumbs to suit my own tastes.
>
> I take no credit for this work. It belongs to the author of the
Golden Spittoon index and the posters of BD Young Strawberry. I only
brought it together.
>
> I sign the csv so you can fault me for my mistakes.
>
> If there are any videos from Young Strawberry, I have not
> indexed them.
>
> If there are updates subsequent to March 2004, I have not indexed
them.
>
> BD Young Strawberry ran from March 2003 to May 2004.
>
> --
> mr.bill
>
>
> --------------= Posted using GrabIt =----------------
> ------= Binary Usenet downloading made easy =---------
> -= Get GrabIt for free from http://www.shemes.com/ =-
|
|